ArticleJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2025
Post-myocardial Infarction Associated Ventricular Septal Defect in an Older Female.
Article in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a serious but uncommon complication that can develop 2 days to 2 weeks after a myocardial infarction (MI), particularly if percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is delayed. Case presentation: A 91-year-old woman with a history of coronary artery disease had undergone PCI in left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex artery (LCX) for a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) 4 weeks prior at another facility, which was complicated by distal wire perforation leading to hemopericardium and the need for pericardiocentesis. She presented with chest pain, and her tests showed ST-segment elevation in leads I, aVL, V2-5, and ST-depression on III, avF, and high troponin levels which were concerning for stent thrombosis. Due to her age and multiple comorbidities, she was managed medically and her code status was changed to do-not-resuscitate/do-not-intubate (DNR/DNI) after family discussion. Echocardiogram revealed a severely reduced ejection fraction and a new mid-inferoseptal VSD detected on readmission. The patient died 4 days later, highlighting the critical importance of timely PCI to prevent severe complications like VSD. Conclusions: VSD lesions although uncommon with the advent of PCI should always be considered in cases with septal lead STEMI and new onset murmur. VSD remains a late complication of STEMI in patients who are managed medically and not offered PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.