ReviewJournal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives2025
Diverticular Abscess and Percutaneous Drainage Outcomes: A Review of Clinical Practice for the Primary Team.
Review in Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inflammation of the diverticular pouch is called acute diverticulitis which can result in abscess formations sometimes. Percutaneous drainage is routinely considered for the management of diverticular abscesses. Being a minimally invasive procedure employed for the removal of large collections of infected fluid from the abscesses, percutaneous drainage emerged as an appealing option. Historically, surgical removal of the abscesses has resulted in multiple hospitalizations and an increased burden on healthcare resources. With the advancement in radiological techniques, CT-guided percutaneous drainage of diverticular abscesses ensured enhanced patient satisfaction and reduced healthcare costs. The choice between surgery or percutaneous drainage of diverticular abscess remains a matter of debate among physicians. The outcomes of percutaneous drainage procedures are scattered across the literature. It is important to be familiar with the criteria regarding the choice of percutaneous drainage or colectomy during the management of diverticular abscesses. Percutaneous drainage can prevent emergent colectomy but it is not always a risk-free procedure. It can bring complications including persistent abscess, new onset abscess, abdominal wall abscess, and peritonitis. Therefore, a physician must prepare in advance to prevent these complications by selecting the right population for the procedure and ensuring good catheter care which involves readjusting the catheter, flushing the catheter and upgrading the size of the catheter. A physician not only prevents these complications but also effectively treats them. This review paper aims to summarize the important outcomes of percutaneous drainage of diverticular abscesses and their further management from a clinical standpoint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.