Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755976›Full record

ArticleJournal of health equity2025

Equity focused workshops: Developing a supplementary method to judge the equity of health interventions.

Gemma Spiers, Jane McDermott, Eugenie Evelyn Johnson, Tafadzwa Patience Kunonga, Barbara Hanratty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health equity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gemma SpiersNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Unit in Healthy Ageing, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Jane McDermottNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Unit in Healthy Ageing, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Eugenie Evelyn JohnsonNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Unit in Healthy Ageing, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Tafadzwa Patience KunongaNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Unit in Healthy Ageing, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Barbara HanrattyNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Unit in Healthy Ageing, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic reviews that consider the equity of interventions are an important method. However, this approach can be limited when analyses of inequity for a specific intervention are rare. We aimed to develop and pilot Equity-Focused Workshops (EFWs), a method to supplement evidence synthesis approaches when primary studies do not report data about intervention equity. A workshop protocol was developed with methods experts, focusing on understanding equitable access to interventions between socioeconomic groups. We tested the protocol in three workshops with populations experiencing material disadvantage, using two hypothetical interventions. Data were collected about participants' views of the intervention, including acceptability and accessibility. Data were summarised and reviewed to appraise the utility of the method to judge intervention equity between socioeconomic groups. Seventeen participants discussed numerous reasons why they might find it difficult to engage with the interventions. These barriers were material, non-material, and offered insight into the ways in which interventions may exclude disadvantaged populations. Issues of stigma, professionals' understanding of material difficulties, and the costs incurred by participants using the interventions were highlighted. EFWs can offer preliminary insights into whether health interventions are likely to exclude populations experiencing material disadvantage. There is value in this approach to supplement evidence syntheses.

Indexed as

disadvantageEquitymethodssocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID40755976
PMCPMC12315834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.