ArticleDigital health
Evaluating the feasibility of a co-designed technology-enabled, collaborative care program for young adults with type 1 diabetes and diabetes distress: A protocol.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06804694 (Technology-Enabled Collaborative Care for Young Adults With Type-1 Diabetes and Diabetes Distress), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Technology-Enabled Collaborative Care for Young Adults With Type-1 Diabetes and Diabetes Distress (TECCT1D3): Feasibility Trial of a Co-designed Intervention
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a complex, chronic condition that requires active and intensive daily self-management, often necessitating specialized and integrated care. Individuals with T1D are at a heightened risk of experiencing diabetes distress (DD) and other mental health challenges, which, when unaddressed, can impair diabetes self-management and diminish quality of life. These challenges are particularly pronounced for young adults with T1D, who must navigate the typical developmental transitions of early adulthood while managing changes in their diabetes care, self-management, and support systems. However, physical and mental healthcare remain fragmented. While previous studies have explored interventions to address DD, many have faced limitations in scalability. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the co-designed technology-enabled collaborative care model (TECC-T1D3) tailored to young adults with T1D and DD. Methods: A randomized controlled trial in young adults aged 18-29 years living with T1D in Ontario, Canada (n = 60), to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the co-designed TECC-T1D3 intervention. Secondary objectives include evaluating the preliminary effectiveness of the program in reducing DD, enhancing self-efficacy, improving quality of life, and exploring the impact of the intervention on connectedness to care and community. Results: This paper presents the trial protocol of the TECC-T1D3 study. Recruitment began in December 2024, and the trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06804694). Conclusion: The TECC-T1D3 study will determine whether a TECC model is feasible and acceptable for young adults with T1D and DD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.