Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755959›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Using large language models to generate child-friendly education materials on myopia.

Xuewei Li, Yixuan Zhang, Tonglei Zheng, Yuanqi Deng, Yuchang Lu, Jie Hu, Sitong Chen, Yan Li, Kai Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xuewei LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Yixuan ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Tonglei ZhengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Yuanqi DengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Yuchang LuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Jie HuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Sitong ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Yan LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University People's Hospital, Eye Diseases and Optometry Institute, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4171-825X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the ability of large language models (LLMs) to produce patient education materials for myopic children and their parents. Methods: Thirty-five common myopia-related questions were used with two distinct prompts to produce responses aimed at adults (Prompt A) and children (Prompt B). Five ophthalmologists evaluated the responses using a 5-point Likert scale for correctness, completeness, conciseness, and potential harm. Readability was assessed via Flesch-Kincaid scores. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney Results: ChatGPT 4o achieved the most positive ratings ("good" and above) in correctness (Prompt A: 91%; Prompt B: 83%) and conciseness (Prompt A: 79%; Prompt B: 63%), as well as the lowest negative ratings in potential harm ratings ("not at all" and "slightly," Prompt A: 99%; Prompt B: 97%) in the generation of educational materials for both adults and children (all Conclusion: Large language models, particularly ChatGPT 4o, hold potential for delivering effective patient education materials on myopia for both adult and pediatric populations. While generally effective, LLMs have limitations for complex medical queries, necessitating continued refinement for reliable clinical use.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceChatGPTlarge language modelsMyopiapatient educationreadability

Identifiers

PMID40755959
PMCPMC12317229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.