Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755955›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Stacked random forest model for colorectal cancer detection using complete blood counts.

Junfeng Luo, Weiwei Tan, Shaobo Chen, Yijing Chen, Ya Fu, Xiaojuan Jing, Lingling Kang, Qingyun Li, Zhenjian Ma, Tingji Sun and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Junfeng LuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanshan Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Weiwei TanDepartment of Pathology, Nanshan Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Shaobo ChenShenzhen Guangming District People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Yijing ChenQuality Management Department, The People's Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, China.
Ya FuShenzhen Bao'an People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaojuan JingDigestive Center Endoscopy Center, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China.
Lingling KangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanshan Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Qingyun LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Zhenjian MaDigestive Endoscopy Center, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, China.
Tingji SunDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanshan Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Shenzhen, China.
Peng XiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Shigui XueDigestive Endoscopy Center, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaozhi WangCollege of Information Science and Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Houde ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanshan Hospital, Guangdong Medical University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8680-0073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In China, adherence to screening colonoscopy among eligible individuals remains suboptimal, primarily due to cost concerns and potential adverse effects. A machine learning model utilizing complete blood count (CBC) data could help prioritize colonoscopy referrals and improve screening participation. Method: This multicenter study included participants who underwent CBC testing within three months before colonoscopy. CBC data were classified into three types (A, B, and C) based on hematology analyzer capabilities, with Type C excluded from analysis. Using Types A and B, we developed a stacking machine learning model incorporating 24 CBC features and 5 combined CBC components to predict colorectal cancer (CRC). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), specificity, and sensitivity. Results: The study included 1795 CRC cases and 26,380 cancer-free individuals with CBC data. On external validation, the model achieved 80.3% specificity and 65.2% sensitivity. Notably, it demonstrated 41% sensitivity for Stage I CRC and 57.6% sensitivity for Stages I-III combined. Conclusions: CBC testing, combined with electronic medical record data, is a low-cost and widely accessible tool. Our robust CRC risk prediction model can serve as a preliminary screening method, aiding in colonoscopy referral decisions and improving CRC screening efficiency.

Indexed as

colonoscopyColorectal cancercomplete blood countelectronic medical recordstacking machine learning model

Identifiers

PMID40755955
PMCPMC12317218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.