ArticleDigital health
A personalized federated learning approach to enhance joint modeling for heterogeneous medical institutions.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translational Potential and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support for Adults in Intensive Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Federated Learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving solution for multi-party data collaboration in smart healthcare. However, the data heterogeneity among hospitals and among patients often results in suboptimal performance for some hospitals when applying a global FL model. Current clustering-based FL methods struggle to adapt to complex and diverse data distributions, negatively impacting model performance. Methods: We propose a novel framework, Federated Gaussian Mixture Clustering (FedGMC), which leverages Gaussian Mixture Clustering to train personalized FL models. FedGMC determines the optimal number of clusters prior to the FL process, reducing the time and computational cost associated with traversing multiple clustering configurations in existing approaches. Results: The FedGMC framework was evaluated using real-world eICU datasets with various classifiers and performance metrics. Experimental results show that FedGMC outperforms other baseline methods in terms of the overall performance of combining two classifiers and two performance metrics. Moreover, it mitigates the risk of performance degraded for participating hospitals following FL. Conclusions: The FedGMC framework effectively addresses clinical heterogeneity, enhancing predictive performance and ensuring fairness among participating medical institutions. These improvements increase the willingness of data owners to engage in the collaboration FL initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.