Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755941›Full record

ReviewmHealth2025

Challenges and enhancement of health: a dual impact of kangaroo care on parents and infants-systematic review.

Harika Yarlagadda, Jomara Sandbulte, Edward Downs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harika YarlagaddaDepartment of Computer Science, Swenson College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5257-4958
Jomara SandbulteDepartment of Computer Science, Swenson College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7798-2853
Edward DownsDepartment of Communication, College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2215-8872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reports show that in 2020 approximately 3.6 million live births were recorded in the United States, with an estimated 9-13% of these infants requiring neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission due to complex medical needs. In the NICUs, where newborns require specialized attention, an interplay unfolds between parents and their infants. Within these sterile walls, each touch, each whispered word, carries significance, creating strong connections during medical treatments. Methods: Our research seeks to examine the intricate relationship between parents and infants in the NICU through careful scientific investigation. Specifically, this paper serves as a foundational review of literature that highlights the importance of continuing research in this field. Results: By examining existing studies, we aim to underscore the importance of attachment between mothers and infants, the necessity of evaluating their individual stress responses, and monitoring physiological changes. Also, we intend to better understand the mutual relationship between mother and child in the NICU setting. Conclusions: Ultimately, by identifying specific interventions that can mitigate the emotional and physiological stresses experienced by both mothers and infants in the NICU, we aim to identify technological needs of the kangaroo care (KC) program and integrate these findings into routine care practices. We expect that this investigation insights will encourage more research on how to promote a more nurturing environment that supports the health and well-being of both mother and child during a NICU stay.

Indexed as

attachmentkangaroo care (KC)mothersNeonatal intensive care unit (NICU)

Identifiers

PMID40755941
PMCPMC12314710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.