ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
The protective effect of biologic and targeted-synthetic therapies on developing multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is a severe, life threatening, complication that arises weeks after acute Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, often presenting with fever and diverse systemic symptoms. Limited data exists on the effectiveness of biologic and targeted-synthetic therapies in preventing MIS-C development. Therefore, our aim was to investigate whether biologic and targeted-synthetic therapies can prevent the occurrence of MIS-C. Methods: We assessed the Clalit Health Services database, the largest health care organization in Israel, data from 793,909 children aged 0-18 years who tested positive for COVID-19 were analyzed. The diagnosis of MIS-C was adjudicated using the case definition used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) or by the World Health Organization (WHO). Patients receiving biologic and targeted-synthetic therapies were compared to a control group. Results: Among 793,909 cases, 573 children received biologic and targeted-synthetic therapies, and 143 cases of MIS-C were identified. Notably, none of the individuals treated with biologic and targeted-synthetic therapies developed MIS-C. Conclusion: Our study highlights our hypothesis on the efficacy of biological treatments in preventing MIS-C. Although statistical significance was not achieved due to the absence of MIS-C cases in patients receiving biologic and targeted-synthetic therapies, our study shows a possible association between biological therapies and reduced risk of MIS-C following COVID-19 infection in children. Further research, including prospective studies with larger cohorts, is warranted to confirm these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.