ArticleSkin health and disease2025
'I'm definitely more confident now': a qualitative study exploring how GP trainees learn about dermatology.
Article in Skin health and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite a high frequency of presentations of skin disease in primary care, research has demonstrated a paucity of dermatology teaching in the medical school curriculum and a variable level of postgraduate dermatology teaching in general practice training. While it is clear that general practitioner (GP) trainees feel they would benefit from additional dermatology teaching, there is a gap in the literature regarding the factors that influence their learning. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify and examine factors that influence the dermatology learning of GP trainees. Methods: A qualitative study of GP trainees in their third and fourth year of their training scheme practising in Ireland was undertaken. Full ethical approval was obtained prior to commencement. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants via Microsoft Teams. Participants were sampled using a combination of purposive, convenience and snowball sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed inductively by employing thematic analysis. Results: Fourteen GP trainees from five GP training schemes in Ireland participated in the study. Emergent themes identified factors that influence the dermatology learning of GP trainees in Ireland. These factors include experiential learning, competing demands, the clinical learning environment and mixed emotions towards dermatology. These influences mainly had a positive effect on the dermatology learning of trainees but certain competing demands such as time and incongruent teaching were felt to hinder their learning. Conclusion: This study broadens our understanding of factors that influence the dermatology learning of GP trainees. Findings generated from this study may be utilized to improve the clinical learning environment and inform the dermatology curriculum of GP trainees.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.