Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755849›Full record

ReviewBioactive materials2025

Biomolecule-functionalized dental implant surfaces: Towards augmenting soft tissue integration.

Ghazal Shineh, Leila Mamizadeh Janghour, Yiyun Xia, Jiayan Shao, Karan Gulati, Giselle C Yeo, Behnam Akhavan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ROS-responsive HBioactive materials · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Dual-Targeted Biomimetic MoSeAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ghazal ShinehSchool of Biomedical Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Leila Mamizadeh JanghourSchool of Biomedical Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Yiyun XiaSchool of Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Jiayan ShaoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Karan GulatiSchool of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, 4006 Australia.
Giselle C YeoCharles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Behnam AkhavanSchool of Biomedical Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental implants are the primary solution for tooth replacement, providing both aesthetic and functional restoration. Their long-term success depends not only on osseointegration but also on robust peri-implant soft tissue integration (PSTI), particularly in the transmucosal region, where a stable epithelial seal is critical to preventing microbial infiltration and peri-implant inflammation. While surface topography modifications such as roughness, morphology, and porosity influence gingival cell behavior, passive surface modifications alone are often insufficient to promote rapid PSTI. This raises a fundamental question in dental implant design: How can implant surfaces be bioengineered to actively promote PSTI rather than passively relying on cellular responses? This review examines how biofunctionalization has emerged as a transformative strategy in implant surface engineering and critically analyses the latest biofunctionalization strategies for dental implants, with a particular focus on the underlying mechanisms that regulate biomolecule-implant interactions. It evaluates biomolecule incorporation via physical and covalent attachment, highlighting their distinct advantages in stability, efficiency, and scalability. We discuss approaches for functionalizing dental implant surfaces with bioactive molecules, such as proteins and peptides, and cells to replicate natural biological interactions, regulate immune responses, and enhance antimicrobial defense mechanisms. By addressing how bioengineered surfaces can be designed to actively engage with biological systems, this review provides a framework for developing next-generation implant technologies that achieve more effective and predictable PSTI, with strong potential for clinical translation.

Indexed as

BiofunctionalizationBiomolecule-implant interactionsDental implantsSoft tissue integrationSurface bioengineering

Identifiers

PMID40755849
PMCPMC12313982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.