ArticleInternational journal of food science2025
Nutrient Content, Functional Properties and Acceptability of Rock Buns Formulated From Freeze-Dried Detroit Dark Red Beetroot Pomace Flour.
Article in International journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beetroot pomace is an underutilised food by-product obtained from the processing of beetroots. However, its rich source of nutrients makes it a potential ingredient for utilisation in rock bun development. The aim of the study was to investigate the nutrient composition and functional properties of freeze-dried beetroot pomace and wheat composite flours, as well as the sensory acceptability of rock buns formulated from these flours. Rock buns were formulated with 95:5, 90:10, 85:15 and 80:20 for wheat flour:freeze-dried beetroot pomace flour (BPF) and 100:0 for the control, respectively. Functional properties and proximate analysis of the flours were determined using standard methods. Sensory evaluation was carried out using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. One-way ANOVA was used to determine significant differences in the mean of the parameters evaluated. Principal component analysis and agglomerative hierarchical clustering exploiting Ward linkage and Euclidean distances were used to establish a visual relationship between the flour samples and some outcome variables. The nutrient composition of composite flour enriched with 20% of BPF showed high fibre, protein and ash content of 1.79%, 11.71% and 2.19%, respectively, compared to the control sample. The swelling power, oil absorption capacity and water absorption capacity increased with increased incorporation of BPF, whilst dispersibility and solubility decreased. The sensory acceptability of the rock buns enriched with 5% and 10% freeze-dried BPF was comparable to the control rock buns formulated from wheat flour only. Rock buns enriched with 10% freeze-dried BPF are nutrient-dense and can compete with control rock buns commercially.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.