ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2025
The Effectivity MultiModality Treatment on Rehabilitation Management of Diabetic Foot Disease Patients for Improvement of Clinical Efficacy & Hemorheological Status.
Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal intervention-comprising rehabilitation management and foot preventive measures-on clinical outcomes, hemorheological parameters, and vascular endothelial function in patients with diabetic foot (DF). Methods: This retrospective study included 126 Results: The intervention group had a significantly higher total treatment efficacy rate (92.06% vs 77.78%, P < 0.05). Post-intervention hemorheological parameters (WBLSV, WBHSV, FIB, EDI) and endothelial markers (ET, bFGF, VEGF, CGRP) showed greater improvement in the intervention group (P < 0.05). Similarly, AHSMSRS scores declined and GSES scores improved more markedly in the intervention group (P < 0.05). Nursing satisfaction was also higher (96.83% vs 71.43%, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with routine nursing care alone, the multimodal intervention strategy may improve clinical efficacy, hemorheology, endothelial function, self-management capabilities, and patient satisfaction in diabetic foot care. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the retrospective design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.