Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755741›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2025

Feedback Framework in Psychiatry Residency Training: A Cross-sectional Survey Amongst Psychiatry Post-graduate Residents of India.

Naresh Nebhinani, Kartik Singhai, Harmanpreet Kaur, Arun Mohanram, Bheemsain Tekkalaki, Kishor M

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Naresh NebhinaniDept. of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8390-3093
Kartik SinghaiDept. of Psychiatry, B.J. Govt Medical College and Sassoon General Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4247-0604
Harmanpreet KaurDept. of Psychiatry, IHBAS Hospital, Delhi, India.
Arun MohanramMedical Education Unit, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
Bheemsain TekkalakiDept. of Psychiatry, KAHER's J.N Medical College, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Kishor MDept. of Psychiatry, JSS Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6428-9152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Feedback has proven crucial in various training systems, especially medical training. However, data regarding the effectiveness of a feedback framework in psychiatry post-graduate (PG) training is limited. Hence, we undertook this survey to assess the essential components of a feedback mechanism in psychiatry PG training in India. Methods: This is a cross-sectional survey in which a questionnaire was circulated online to residents pursuing psychiatry training across various medical colleges, institutions, and hospitals in India. The questionnaire aimed to cover various aspects of a feedback program for psychiatry PG training. The target audience was kept as residents since they are the main benefactors of an effective feedback system. Results: We received responses from 262 residents from 84 departments nationwide. The majority ( Conclusions: The survey highlights that residents strongly need a feedback mechanism during psychiatry residency. Implementing a feedback program and constantly evaluating its effectiveness could go a long way in improving psychiatry training outcomes in India.

Indexed as

effectiveFeedbackIndiapost-graduatepsychiatryreal-timetraining

Identifiers

PMID40755741
PMCPMC12313597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.