ArticleTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Development and validation of a machine learning-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of laparoscopic surgical difficulty in gallstone patients.
Article in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for predicting surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preoperative prediction of laparoscopic surgical difficulty in gallstone patients is crucial for improving surgical outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram based on advanced machine learning algorithms, incorporating key clinical and systemic inflammatory response indicators, such as the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 362 eligible patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for gallstones between 2013 and 2019. A total of 420 patients were initially identified, with 58 excluded based on predefined criteria such as age and incomplete records. The remaining patients were divided into a training set (n=253) and a validation set (n=109). The development of the nomogram involved multiple analytical techniques, including machine learning methods such as least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, decision tree analysis, and support vector machine (SVM) models, along with traditional statistical methods like univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Significant predictors, including CAR, white blood cell count (WBC), and gallbladder wall thickness, were integrated into the final predictive model. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and calibration plots. Results: The machine learning-based model demonstrated strong predictive capability, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.774 in the training set and 0.863 in the validation set. Calibration plots showed good agreement between predicted and actual outcomes, with mean absolute errors of 0.035 and 0.05 for the training and validation sets, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the utility of applying machine learning algorithms to develop a robust nomogram for preoperative prediction of laparoscopic surgical difficulty. By integrating key clinical variables and systemic inflammatory markers, the model provides an effective tool for improving surgical planning and enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.