Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755729›Full record

ArticleTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2025

Ciprofol exerts anti-tumour effects in hepatocellular carcinoma through the Raf-MEK-ERK signalling pathway.

Yining Chen, Ping Shi, Suiqing Zhou, Kai Yu, Yulang Wang, Feifan Yao, Ruizhi Zhang, Xinyang Liu, Chunyao Fang, Xiaofeng Tie and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yining Chen *Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0065-4378
Ping Shi *Department of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Suiqing Zhou *Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Kai Yu *Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Yulang Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Yiwu, China.
Feifan YaoHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Ruizhi ZhangHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Xinyang LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China.
Chunyao FangHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Xiaofeng TieHepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Key Laboratory of Liver Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, NHC Key Laboratory of Living Donor Liver Transplantation (Nanjing Medical University), Nanjing, China.
Jun LiDepartment of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jing XuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jiali XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Xiongxiong PanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2747-3241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent malignant tumours of the digestive system and the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. As the most common type of primary liver cancer, HCC is associated with poor prognosis despite advancements in treatment options such as radical resection, liver transplantation, and adjuvant therapies. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of HCC treatment; however, postoperative recurrence and metastasis pose significant challenges to patient survival. Intraoperative factors, including immune suppression and the use of certain anaesthetics, have been implicated in tumour cell dissemination and recurrence. While anaesthetic agents like propofol are known to influence tumour cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Ciprofol, a novel intravenous anaesthetic, has demonstrated clinical safety and efficacy, but its potential impact on HCC progression and underlying mechanisms requires further exploration. This study aims to explore how ciprofol affects the behaviour of HCC cells and the underlying mechanisms. Methods: Hep3B and HCCLM3 HCC cell lines were treated with varying concentrations of ciprofol. The cell numbers were measured at different time points using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) to find the active concentration. Proliferation was assessed by colony formation and 5-ethynl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) assays, whereas invasion and migration were tested using Transwell and wound healing assays. Subcutaneous xenograft and orthotopic liver transplantation models were used to study tumour growth Results: Ciprofol inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of Hep3B and HCCLM3 cells in a manner dependent on both time and dosage. It also reduced tumour growth and lung metastasis in mice. RNA-seq showed that ciprofol affected the MAPK/ERK pathway, which was confirmed by the reduced phosphorylation levels of Raf, MEK, and ERK, without affecting total protein levels. Conclusions: Ciprofol inhibited the MAPK/ERK pathway by reducing the phosphorylation of Raf, MEK, and ERK, which may explain its inhibitory effects on HCC. The results of this study could guide the use of anaesthetic drugs in HCC surgery.

Indexed as

anti-tumourCiprofolERKhepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)MAPK

Identifiers

PMID40755729
PMCPMC12314693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.