ReviewCureus2025
Nutraceutical Supplementation Effects on Subjective Fatigue Symptoms in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating condition marked by severe, long-lasting fatigue and exhaustion that does not improve with rest. ME/CFS is reported in individuals of all ages and various racial, socioeconomic, and ethnic groups. This condition lacks standard treatment. Nutritional supplements and dietary interventions are often used to manage symptoms, but the efficacy of these interventions remains scarce in the current literature. This systematic review aims to evaluate and summarize recent evidence on nutrient supplementation and diet-based interventions in patients with ME/CFS sourced from clinical trial registries and article databases. Registries improve the quality, integrity, and transparency of clinical trials by providing a standardized platform for reporting study design and results and, thus, reducing the biases related to selective reporting practices. Systematic reviews using these registries, therefore, are an efficient pathway to acquire current medical evidence for use in clinical decision-making and the development of practice guidance in various fields. ClinicalTrials.gov, Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science were systematically searched for interventional studies in which patients suffering from ME/CFS supplemented or altered their diet. The results of this review showed several supplements that suggest improvement in patients' symptomatology, including nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), wasabi, and probiotics. However, many of these registered clinical trials did not employ the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)'s National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) suggested common data elements (CDEs). These standardized outcome-measuring tools allow the generalization and true comparison of the patient-reported outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.