Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755687›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Case Report of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Pregnancy: A Challenging Diagnosis.

Zade Zahlan, Anne V Sauber, Cristina Cota Peimbert

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zade ZahlanInternal Medicine, MountainView Hospital, Las Vegas, USA.
Anne V SauberCardiology, Touro University, Las Vegas, USA.
Cristina Cota PeimbertInternal Medicine, MountainView Hospital, Las Vegas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lemierre's syndrome and spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) are rare and potentially life-threatening conditions that seldom occur concurrently. Lemierre's syndrome typically presents as septic thrombophlebitis of the internal jugular vein following an oropharyngeal infection, while SCAD is a non-atherosclerotic tear in the coronary artery wall, often associated with pregnancy. The co-occurrence of these two conditions is exceedingly rare and presents complex diagnostic and management challenges, particularly in pregnant patients. We describe a case of a 36-year-old woman at 22 weeks of gestation who presented with a three-day history of left-sided neck pain, chest pain, and shortness of breath. Initial workup included an electrocardiogram, which showed nonspecific T-wave changes, serial troponin measurements that revealed a rising trend, and a duplex ultrasound of the neck, which revealed an intramural hematoma in the coronary arteries suggestive of SCAD, along with an occlusive thrombus in the left internal jugular vein consistent with Lemierre's syndrome. This case highlights a rare overlap of SCAD and Lemierre's syndrome in pregnancy. Hormonal and hemodynamic changes likely contributed to both conditions. Treatment required careful balancing of anticoagulation risks and benefits. To our knowledge, this is one of the first reported cases of concurrent SCAD and Lemierre's syndrome in a pregnant patient. It underscores the need for vigilant assessment and coordinated care in rare, high-risk vascular presentations during pregnancy.

Indexed as

atypical spontaneous coronary artery dissectiondissectioninternal jugular thrombusinternal jugular venous thrombuslemierrelemierre'slemierre's and lemierre's like syndromespontaneous coronary artery dissectionthrombosis in pregnancythrombus

Identifiers

PMID40755687
PMCPMC12317680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.