ArticleCureus2025
Impact of a Prospective Simulation-Based Mastery Learning With Deliberate Practice Intervention on Neonatal Intubation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Simulation-based Mastery Learning Curriculum to Address Cardiac Point-of-care Ultrasound Requirements of Anesthesiology Board Certification.The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo design and implement a simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curriculum utilizing deliberate practice (DP) for neonatal intubation in the delivery room setting. We sought to investigate the impact this curriculum would have on performance and skill retention.
methodsA prospective single-group SBML with DP intervention to improve intubation success was implemented from 2019 to 2022. Pediatric hospitalists (PHs) and neonatal nurse practitioners (NNPs) who provide care in the delivery room were eligible to participate. An 11-item checklist was developed, and a minimum passing standard (MPS) was set using the Mastery Angoff method. Participants underwent a baseline assessment, followed by DP with expert feedback. Post-intervention assessments were completed until the MPS was achieved, with additional practice rounds if needed. After three to six months, all participants underwent a retention assessment. If MPS was not achieved at retention, further DP was provided until MPS was met.
resultsAt the time of enrollment, 95% of participants had limited experience with attempted neonatal intubation (less than five performed), and 14% had never attempted an actual neonatal intubation. At baseline assessment, 95% of participants did not meet the MPS. Participants' mean scores significantly improved on the intubation checklist from 74% to 99% from baseline to post-training assessment. The intervention was significant and impactful, with effect sizes of >2. At the three-to-six-month retention assessment, 66% of participants met the MPS on the first attempt. Overall, 92% reported an increased confidence level with the procedure and an improvement in their clinical practice.
conclusionsOur SBML with DP neonatal intubation curriculum is an effective tool to train providers in neonatal intubation for the delivery room environment. As clinical opportunities to learn this procedure continue to decline, programs must develop ways to optimize proficiency in this skill.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.