ArticleCureus2025
Material and Technological Advancements in the Recontouring of Maxillofacial, Somatic, and Dental Structures and Their Implications for Auricular Prosthesis: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recontouring of disfigured maxillofacial and dental parts in prosthodontics is a process that goes beyond physical alteration, significantly enhancing patients' psychological well-being. This paper comprehensively analyzes the techniques, materials, and clinical approaches used in the cosmetic recontouring of disfigured parts, such as teeth, gingival tissues, maxillofacial, and somatic (missing body parts like fingers, hands, or prosthetic legs) prostheses. It elaborates on the clinical and laboratory steps involved in the fabrication of auricular prostheses using room temperature vulcanizing (RTV) silicone as a maxillofacial material, which gives a life-like appearance. It helps regain the overall aesthetics of the patient. The prosthesis was well retained through the use of silicone adhesives and the available undercut present at the ear defect site. The prognosis was good in terms of retention, stability, support of the prosthesis, and comfort for the patient, even after six months of follow-up. Additionally, it gives insights into higher-quality, affordable, and readily available advanced recontour prosthesis materials and modern techniques employed. Recontouring of maxillofacial, somatic, and dental structures is not just a professional duty but a moral imperative, ensuring that the patient's needs and well-being are at the forefront of every decision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.