ArticleCureus2025
Improving Image Quality in Computed Tomography-Guided Biopsy Using Deep Learning Reconstruction.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy offers procedural safety and is widely used for the diagnosis of lesions. Recently, CT systems with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) have become available, offering enhanced noise reduction and the potential to reduce radiation exposure. However, DLR does not support real-time imaging in CT fluoroscopy (CTF), limiting its use in interventional procedures. In this technical report, we investigate the image quality and reconstruction time of DLR in CT-guided biopsy using conventional (non-CTF) methods. Using a routine inspection phantom provided with the CT system, imaging was performed at setting standard deviation (SD) values of 20, 30, 40, and 50 Hounsfield units (HU); image noise and reconstruction time for three reconstruction methods (filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), and DLR) were measured. SD was used as a quantitative measure of image noise. The results showed that DLR had the lowest image noise, followed by HIR and FBP, and the higher the setting SD, the more pronounced the difference. This indicates that DLR can improve image quality while maintaining diagnostic image quality and reducing radiation exposure. However, DLR had the longest reconstruction time, exceeding 10 seconds to output six images. Although DLR has obvious advantages in image quality and dose reduction, the associated delay in image reconstruction currently limits its use to procedures where real-time imaging is not essential. When real-time imaging is not required, DLR should be used in conjunction with conventional methods to reduce patient radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.