ArticleCureus2025
X-ray Image-Based Pose Estimation of a Joint-Encoded Spinal Surgical Positioning Arm.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design and Preliminary Phantom Study of a 3D-Printed Wrist Immobilization Device for Lateral Radiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive spinal surgery requires accurate and efficient surgical tool positioning; however, current optical or navigation-assisted systems can be costly, complex, or expose patients to increased radiation. To address these challenges, we propose and evaluate a novel passive spinal surgical positioning arm with X-ray image-based pose estimation capability. The system estimates the 6-degree-of-freedom pose of the arm using radiographic landmarks extracted from a single intraoperative X-ray image. In our experiment, a surgeon performed single-level pedicle screw placement on three sawbones spine models. The estimated positioning accuracy achieved a mean translational error of 1.08 ± 0.40 mm. The average setup time was 2.3 ± 0.9 minutes, and the surgical operation time was 4.2 ± 1.8 minutes. Only 6.75 ± 0.95 X-ray images were required per procedure, resulting in an average radiation dose of 0.27 ± 0.04 mGy. These results demonstrate that our system can potentially reduce radiation exposure and surgical duration while maintaining high positioning accuracy. Further clinical validation is required to confirm its effectiveness in real-world surgical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.