Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755646›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Penile Calciphylaxis: Two Clinical Cases and a Literature Review.

Jorge Martin Millet, David Josue Saavedra, Antonio Esqueda-Mendoza, Eduardo Cruz Nuricumbo

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jorge Martin MilletDepartment of Urology, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Peninsula de Yucatan (HRAEPY), Merida, MEX.
David Josue SaavedraDepartment of Urology, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Peninsula de Yucatan (HRAEPY), Merida, MEX.
Antonio Esqueda-MendozaDepartment of Urology, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Peninsula de Yucatan (HRAEPY), Merida, MEX.
Eduardo Cruz NuricumboDepartment of Urology, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de la Peninsula de Yucatan (HRAEPY), Merida, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile necrosis secondary to calcification of medium- and small-caliber arteries supplying the organ is a rare and serious condition. It often occurs in patients with multiple comorbidities, carries a high mortality rate, and has a poor prognosis. We present two cases of male patients with multiple comorbidities who developed penile calciphylaxis. Both patients underwent various treatments, including total penectomy in one case and palliative management in the other. One patient declined surgery and was lost to follow-up, while the other required multiple surgical procedures due to infectious complications. A review of the literature suggests no clear survival benefit between surgical and conservative management. Therefore, surgical treatment should be reserved for cases with disabling pain or advanced infections at risk of severe complications.

Indexed as

diabetes mellitus(dm)necrosispartial penectomypenile calciphylaxispenile diseasestotal penectomyvascular calcification

Identifiers

PMID40755646
PMCPMC12318453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.