ReviewCureus2025
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Alpha-Stat and pH-Stat Strategies During Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accidental hypothermia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Aortic Arch and Frozen Elephant Trunk Surgery: Anesthetic Challenges and Strategies for Organ Protection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the conflicting effects on cerebral perfusion and metabolic control, the optimal acid-base management strategy for hypothermic circulatory arrest remains a matter of ongoing debate, particularly concerning the α-stat and pH-stat approaches. This article presents a systematic review and analysis of the clinical and physiological effectiveness of these two methods in patients undergoing surgery of the aortic arch or ascending aorta. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect, covering studies published between 2010 and 2025, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Seven studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed, encompassing both pediatric and adult populations. The primary outcomes assessed were cerebral blood flow, oxygenation indices (SjvO₂, CEO₂), cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen, and postoperative neurological recovery. The evidence indicated that pH-stat management led to a more rapid attainment of target hypothermia and enhanced cerebral oxygen delivery in pediatric patients, largely due to CO₂-mediated vasodilation and more uniform cooling. However, these benefits were accompanied by a higher risk of impaired cerebral autoregulation. In contrast, the α-stat strategy preserved physiologic autoregulatory responses, maintained metabolic stability, and was associated with lower postoperative neurological deficits in adult cohorts. Several of the included studies performed quantitative synthesis or meta-analytical comparison, with a trend favoring α-stat in adult patients regarding long-term neurological outcomes. Although pH-stat may offer specific advantages in neonates and young children, α-stat appears to provide a more physiologically appropriate regulation of pH and cerebral hemodynamics in adults. The heterogeneity of study populations, surgical contexts, and outcome measures reinforces the need for an individualized approach. These findings support the consideration of hybrid strategies employing pH-stat during the cooling phase and α-stat during rewarming to balance perfusion benefits and metabolic control. Ultimately, no single strategy demonstrated consistent superiority, and acid-base therapy should be tailored to factors such as patient age, cerebral vulnerability, and procedural complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.