Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755611›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Loneliness, Support, and Care Models in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Vasiliki A Aslanidou, George Charalambous, Alexandra Skitsou, Petros Galanis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vasiliki A AslanidouHealth Unit Management, Frederick University, Nicosia, CYP.
George CharalambousEmergency Medicine, General Hospital of Athens "Ippokrateio", Athens, GRC.
Alexandra SkitsouHealth Sciences, Frederick University, Nicosia, CYP.
Petros GalanisEpidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Nursing, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim This study compares the quality of life (QoL) and mental health of older adults receiving institutional versus family-based care in Greece, focusing on the role of perceived social support and psychological loneliness. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with 600 adults aged ≥65 years using validated instruments (Short Form Health Survey - 12 items, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support - 12 items, and UCLA Loneliness Scale - 20 items. Multivariable linear regression was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (Released 2013; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) to identify associations between care setting, psychosocial variables, and QoL outcomes. Results Men reported significantly higher physical QoL scores than women (p = 0.025). Chronic illness and polypharmacy were associated with lower QoL (p = 0.001). Urban residents and insured individuals reported better mental health (p = 0.003; p = 0.007). Unexpectedly, higher loneliness correlated positively with physical health (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in QoL between care settings. Conclusions The quality of perceived social support plays a more decisive role in shaping older adults' well-being than the type of care environment. These findings support the promotion of relationship-centered models of eldercare.

Indexed as

aging populationelderly careinstitutionalizationpsychological lonelinessquality of lifesocial support

Identifiers

PMID40755611
PMCPMC12317661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.