ArticleCureus2025
Acceleration of Diagnosis and Treatment Initiation Using the Elecsys® HCV Duo Assay.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Performance of the Elecsys HCV Duo Immunoassay Compared with a Standard-of-Care Algorithm Using Alinity Anti-HCV Screening and HCV RNA Confirmation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study determined the number of patients with positive hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA results who were eligible to receive direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy at Nara Medical University and identified effective screening methods in this population. Between June 2021 and May 2024, the RNA detection status of HCV antibody (Ab)-positive cases, including RNA detection rates (RNA detection number/antibody-positive number) and positive rates (RNA-positive number/RNA detection number), was evaluated. Among the 866 patients who tested positive for anti-HCV antibodies, HCV RNA testing was performed in 29.2% (n = 253), comprising 57 patients from the Department of Gastroenterology and 196 from other departments. Of these 253 patients, 26 (45.6%) from the Department of Gastroenterology and 16 (8.2%) from other departments tested positive for HCV RNA. RNA positivity was observed in 16.6% of cases (42/253). The remaining 70.8% (n = 613) of antibody-positive patients did not undergo HCV RNA testing. This group included 41 patients from the Department of Gastroenterology and 572 from other departments. Based on the observed HCV RNA positivity rates within each department, it is estimated that among these 613 untested patients, approximately 66 may be HCV RNA-positive, 19 (45.6%) from the Department of Gastroenterology and 47 (8.2%) from other departments. Overall, 66 patients will potentially remain HCV RNA-positive. The simultaneous evaluation of HCV antibodies and HCV RNA can efficiently identify patients with chronic HCV infection who are eligible for DAA therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.