Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755598›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Treatments for Inhalant and Volatile Substance Misuse: A Scoping Review.

Gary Lail, Vanessa C Cornelio, Kimberly Go, Kiran Kaur, Piotr Slowik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gary LailPsychiatry, William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, USA.
Vanessa C CornelioPsychiatry, William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, USA.
Kimberly GoPsychiatry, St. John's Episcopal Hospital, Far Rockaway, USA.
Kiran KaurPsychiatry, St. John's Episcopal Hospital, Far Rockaway, USA.
Piotr SlowikPsychiatry, St. John's Episcopal Hospital, Far Rockaway, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhalant and volatile substance misuse present significant challenges to society, yet the treatment options have largely been overlooked. Currently, there are no FDA-approved pharmacotherapies for inhalant use disorders. Additionally, there are limited nonpharmacological studies focused on the treatment and management of the disorders. These limitations have made it difficult to establish a standardized approach when treating the disorder and have limited the treatment options available to individuals facing the addiction. This scoping review examines the proposed treatment options for inhalant and volatile substance misuse. It categorizes the proposed treatments and specifically outlines their effectiveness and limiting factors. The review utilized multiple databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and PsycINFO to explore various case reports, public health reports, clinical trials, and community-based programs. There was a focus on studies and reports that specifically explored the pharmacological, psychosocial, supportive, and holistic approaches in treating and managing the disorder. The supportive approaches primarily focused on medical stabilization during the initial hospitalization. They emphasized the management of the airway, breathing, circulation, disability, and exposure (ABCDE) approach, along with patient decontamination. However, these methods offered limited insight into their long-term effectiveness in addressing inhalant and volatile substance misuse. In contrast, pharmacological approaches did explore long-term outcomes in managing inhalant use disorders. Clinical studies involving medications such as aripiprazole showed significant reductions in sustained inhalant use. Similarly, case reports examining the use of baclofen, naltrexone, and lamotrigine reported varying degrees of success in promoting abstinence from inhalants and volatile substances. Nevertheless, these findings were primarily based on small clinical trials and case reports, thus limiting conclusions about their broader effectiveness. Holistic and multifaceted programs, such as the Youth Solvent Addiction Program (YSAP) and the Mt Theo Program, demonstrated the highest success rates among the interventions reviewed. Many of these residential programs incorporated various culturally specific strategies. While effective in their respective contexts, they may pose challenges for broader replication. Psychosocial interventions, including cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)-based brief interventions and family therapy, also demonstrated a reduction of volatile substance use. Yet, they require larger, more comprehensive studies to better evaluate their efficacy. The treatment of inhalant and volatile substance misuse has been approached through various mechanisms. Multiple studies and reports involving the supportive, holistic, pharmacological, and psychosocial approaches have successfully demonstrated varying levels of success when managing inhalant and volatile substance misuse. Yet, no FDA-approved pharmacological treatment or standardized approaches have been developed for managing the disorder. The literature review found that many of the approaches have only demonstrated efficacy on smaller scales and were limited by a culturally specific context. Therefore, further research employing large-scale and multifaceted methodologies is necessary to establish the efficacy and replicability of these interventions.

Indexed as

addictionaddiction disorderaddiction psychiatryinhalant misuseinhalant use disordersubstance abusesubstance abuse preventionsubstance addictiontreatment choices

Identifiers

PMID40755598
PMCPMC12313550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.