ReviewCureus2025
The Efficacy and Safety of Use of Cannabis and Cannabinoid Products for Pain Relief in Orthopaedic Conditions and Trauma.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy Based on Self-Reported Cannabis Use: A Matched-Controlled Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Cannabis Use in Orthopaedic Surgery: Effects on Fracture Healing, Opioid Requirements, and Clinical Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review examines the efficacy of medical cannabis in pain management within orthopaedic domains, including arthritis pain, postsurgical pain, back pain, and post-trauma pain. Given the challenges and risks associated with traditional pain medications, particularly opioids, this review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of medical cannabis for orthopaedic pain management. A literature search was conducted on databases such as PubMed and Cochrane to find primary research papers on the efficacy and safety of cannabis. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on available literature, focusing on studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of medical cannabis in various orthopaedic pain conditions. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included to keep the evidence of high quality. The quality of the studies was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The review particularly assessed the effectiveness of medical cannabis compared to no treatment, placebo, and active comparators. Additionally, the review examined the optimal dosing, methods of administration, and the safety profile of medical cannabis. The review reveals minimal high-quality evidence supporting the efficacy of medical cannabis in the targeted orthopaedic areas. Most evidence suggests effectiveness only when compared with no treatment or placebo, with limited data against active comparators. The review also highlights the need for more research to determine optimal dosing and administration methods. The safety profile of medical cannabis, characterised by generally mild to moderate adverse effects, suggests its potential as a safer alternative or adjunct to opioid pain management. The findings indicate that while medical cannabis may hold promise as an alternative or adjunct therapy in orthopaedic pain management, there is a need for more robust and methodologically sound research. Future studies should focus on long-term efficacy and safety, standardisation of dosing and administration, and comprehensive reporting of adverse effects. This is essential for developing effective treatment protocols that balance pain relief with safety and understanding the role of medical cannabis in orthopaedic pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.