Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755580›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Cadaveric Analysis of Valvular Anatomy in the Great Saphenous Vein: Implications for Surgical Planning.

Schafer Paladichuk, Alexander Downs, Zachary Brennan, Tianfu Shang, David Dommermuth, Steve Zeka, Dan Murphy, Ronald Walser, Tyler J Wallen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Schafer PaladichukDepartment of Anatomy, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, USA.
Alexander DownsDepartment of Anatomy, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, USA.
Zachary BrennanDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Tianfu ShangDepartment of General Surgery, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA.
David DommermuthDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sutter Health, Roseville, USA.
Steve ZekaDepartment of Anatomy, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, USA.
Dan MurphyDepartment of Anatomy, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, USA.
Ronald WalserDepartment of Anatomy, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, USA.
Tyler J WallenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Wilkes-Barre, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and aim Coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease remain significant health concerns in the United States. If left untreated, surgical interventions like coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and peripheral vascular bypass (PVB) are frequently performed to restore vascular perfusion. The great saphenous vein (GSV) has historically been a primary conduit for these procedures. Complications involving the GSV include early-onset thrombosis and atherosclerosis, which are partly attributed to tunica intima valve flaps. These flaps can disrupt laminar flow even when the GSV is reversed. However, the GSV continues to play a crucial role in multi-vessel revascularization and PVB surgeries. This study aimed to analyze the GSV's anatomical characteristics, particularly the distribution and spacing of its valves. Methods Cadaveric specimens were examined from 2021 to 2024. The GSV was incised, valve locations were marked and measured in relation to the inferior base of medial malleolus. Statistical analyses, including Student's t-tests and ANOVA, were performed to assess differences. Results Results from 96 GSVs across 66 cadavers indicated an average of 5.7 valves per left GSV and 5.5 per right GSV. Significant differences were found between valve distributions above vs. below the knee (p<0.001), with increased inter-valve distance below the knee (p<0.001). Conclusion These data suggest that below knee segments may be more suitable for grafting because they have fewer valves and increased inter-valve distance. This study has the potential to provide insights for optimizing vein graft selection and improving surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

atherosclerosiscoronary artery bypass graftinggreat saphenous veinperipheral vascular bypassthrombosisvalves

Identifiers

PMID40755580
PMCPMC12317783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.