ArticleCureus2025
Comparison of Side Effects of Anti-epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (Anti-EGFR) Antibody Drugs During Initial Induction and Reinduction in Colorectal Cancer: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transient receptor potential melastatin 6 and transient receptor potential melastatin 6/7 antagonists suppress colon adenocarcinoma HT-29 cells.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibodies are used to treat colorectal cancer. The incidence of side effects is higher in patients who receive re-administration than in those who were initially introduced. In this report, we describe three cases. Case 1 involved a woman in her 70s. Compared with the initial administration, skin rash, skin dryness, and stomatitis grades were observed to be high. Finally, the patient was diagnosed with progressive disease (PD) after five months, which was shorter than that at the time of initial administration. Case 2 involved a man in his 70s, who was restarted on panitumumab monotherapy. Approximately one month after re-administration, the patient developed early grade 3 skin symptoms and hypomagnesemia, peaking at 0.8 mg/dL. Finally, the patient was diagnosed with PD after approximately six months, which was shorter than that at the time of initial administration. Case 3 involved a man in his 30s. After resuming the same treatment, the patient developed paronychia up to grade 3, which continued for approximately two years with dermatological intervention. In the ambulatory therapy center, multi-disciplinary medical staff are involved in the prevention of serious complications. Early intervention and patient education regarding the adverse effects connected with re-administration are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.