Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755575›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Comparison of Side Effects of Anti-epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (Anti-EGFR) Antibody Drugs During Initial Induction and Reinduction in Colorectal Cancer: A Case Series.

Tadafumi Hoshida, Kazufumi Tanabe, Masanobu Tsubaki, Noriaki Nagai, Shozo Nishida

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tadafumi HoshidaDepartment of Pharmacy, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, JPN.
Kazufumi TanabeDepartment of Pharmacy, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, JPN.
Masanobu TsubakiLaboratory of Pharmacotherapy, Kagawa School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokushima Bunri University, Sanuki, JPN.
Noriaki NagaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Higashi-osaka, JPN.
Shozo NishidaDepartment of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Higashi-osaka, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibodies are used to treat colorectal cancer. The incidence of side effects is higher in patients who receive re-administration than in those who were initially introduced. In this report, we describe three cases. Case 1 involved a woman in her 70s. Compared with the initial administration, skin rash, skin dryness, and stomatitis grades were observed to be high. Finally, the patient was diagnosed with progressive disease (PD) after five months, which was shorter than that at the time of initial administration. Case 2 involved a man in his 70s, who was restarted on panitumumab monotherapy. Approximately one month after re-administration, the patient developed early grade 3 skin symptoms and hypomagnesemia, peaking at 0.8 mg/dL. Finally, the patient was diagnosed with PD after approximately six months, which was shorter than that at the time of initial administration. Case 3 involved a man in his 30s. After resuming the same treatment, the patient developed paronychia up to grade 3, which continued for approximately two years with dermatological intervention. In the ambulatory therapy center, multi-disciplinary medical staff are involved in the prevention of serious complications. Early intervention and patient education regarding the adverse effects connected with re-administration are essential.

Indexed as

anti-egfr antibody drugschemotherapycolorectal cancerreinductionside effects

Identifiers

PMID40755575
PMCPMC12316474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.