ArticleCureus2025
Exploratory Study on the Prevalence of Peripheral Artery Disease in Asymptomatic Patients With Diabetes and Hypertension in a Family Health Unit.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLower extremity artery disease (LEAD) represents a manifestation of atherosclerosis, with the majority of affected individuals remaining asymptomatic. Whether asymptomatic or not, LEAD is associated with a three- to six-fold increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, underscoring the importance of early intervention. The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is a recommended screening tool for LEAD, with a diagnostic threshold defined as an ABI of ≤0.90. Patients with arterial hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus (DM) are at elevated risk for developing LEAD, yet systematic screening for this condition is lacking in this population. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic LEAD in patients with arterial hypertension and/or DM, while the secondary objective was to identify the main predictors of LEAD in this population. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was an exploratory, observational, cross-sectional study involving a random sample of patients with DM and/or arterial hypertension enrolled in a family health unit (FHU), aged 50 to 66 years, without very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) or symptoms of LEAD. ABI was measured, and LEAD was diagnosed if ABI ≤0.90. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® software.
resultsThe study included 146 patients, of whom 134 had arterial hypertension, and 68 had DM, with a mean age of 59.5±4.2 years. Eight patients were diagnosed with LEAD, yielding a prevalence of 5.5%. Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups with and without LEAD in the following variables: abdominal circumference (p=0.043), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation (p=0.024), duration of arterial hypertension (p=0.024), and LDL levels (p=0.014), with higher medians in the LEAD group. DISCUSSION: There are several studies calculating the prevalence of LEAD, but variations in study populations make direct comparisons challenging. The LEAD group showed higher abdominal circumference, longer hypertension duration, and elevated LDL cholesterol, consistent with existing literature. However, the significantly higher GFR observed in this group using the CG equation was unexpected. This may be explained by the inclusion of body weight in the CG formula, which can overestimate GFR in individuals with central obesity due to increased fat mass rather than increased renal function. Conversely, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, which does not incorporate body weight, showed no significant difference in GFR between groups, supporting the hypothesis that CG estimates were biased by body composition. Regarding limitations, this study possibly had information and inter-observer bias, a lack of confirmation of diagnosis by imaging study, as well as an under-representation of smokers, an important risk factor for LEAD, which may have influenced the calculation of prevalence.
conclusionThe prevalence of asymptomatic LEAD in patients with DM and/or arterial hypertension within our sample was 5.5%. The results suggest that patients with higher abdominal circumference, longer duration of arterial hypertension, and elevated LDL are at increased risk for LEAD, supporting the prioritization of this population for screening. However, further studies are essential to better define the optimal target population for LEAD screening in Portugal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.