ArticleCureus2025
The Emergence of Subclones Following Initial Chemotherapy in Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) is a rare subtype of acute leukemias, and it is characterized by the immunophenotypic expression of multiple hematopoietic lineages and the potential for lineage switching post-treatment. Diagnosing MPAL can be challenging, particularly in cases with small immunophenotypically distinct subclones or subpopulations exhibiting weak antigen expression. We present two cases of MPAL where subclones or lineage switches emerged following initial treatment. Both cases exhibited a myeloperoxidase (MPO)-positive population of leukemic cells, which was initially either undervalued or overestimated, complicating their diagnosis. In one case, leukemic blasts tested negative for MPO in immunohistochemical (IHC) staining; however, flow cytometric analysis revealed a minor subclone that was weakly positive for MPO. In the other patient, leukemic blasts tested positive for MPO through IHC staining. The latter patient was diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia; however, the leukemic cells exhibited lymphoblastic morphological features and co-expressed both myeloid and lymphoblastic antigens in each case. Following initial treatments, selective pressure causes the proliferation of leukemic cells resistant to chemotherapy, with an immunophenotypic shift in the blasts, requiring treatment modification in both cases. These two cases highlight the diagnostic and therapeutic complexities of MPAL and underscore the crucial role of comprehensive immunophenotyping in identifying minor subclones, thereby ensuring an accurate diagnosis, informing treatment selection, and facilitating timely therapeutic adjustments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.