Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755565›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Comparative Effectiveness of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block and Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Nusratun Naim, Md Selim Reza, Anwar Umar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nusratun NaimGeneral Surgery, James Paget University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Coventry, GBR.
Md Selim RezaGeneral (Internal) Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, GBR.
Anwar UmarGeneral Surgery, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) are commonly used techniques for managing postoperative pain following abdominal surgery. While TEA has traditionally been the gold standard, TAP block has emerged as a simpler, potentially safer alternative. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of TAP block versus TEA across multiple postoperative outcomes in abdominal surgery. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared TAP block and TEA in adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Primary outcomes included pain scores at rest and during coughing at 24 and 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption, incidence of hypotension, time to pass first flatus, and hospital stay. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the

Indexed as

abdominal surgerypain managementtap blockthoracic epidural analgesiavas pain score

Identifiers

PMID40755565
PMCPMC12315932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.