ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2025
Orthopaedic surgeons' perspectives on peripheral nerve blocks for surgical fixation of hip fractures in older adults.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Outcomes Associated With Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Comparison of Medicare Data.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Association Between Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults with Hip Fractures: An Analysis of the Premier Healthcare Database.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to identify factors influencing orthopaedic surgeons' decision to request peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) for older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery and to assess the need for further research. Design: A cross-sectional survey. Setting: Academic and private practice. Participants: One hundred twenty-nine orthopaedic surgeons. Intervention: A 24-question survey assessed PNB usage, perceived advantages and disadvantages. Main Outcome Measures: Survey responses describing factors influencing orthopaedic surgeons' decision to request PNBs for older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery. Results: Seventy-one percent of orthopaedic surgeons reported they believed there were benefits to using PNBs for older adults undergoing surgical fixation of hip fractures. The main perceived advantages were reduced pain and opioid use within 72 hours postoperatively. Primary concerns about PNB use were the negative impact on clinical care efficiency and delayed mobilization. Most surgeons (85%) agreed that higher-level evidence investigating benefits beyond acute postoperative pain control would aid decision-making. Conclusion: Surgeons believe PNBs provide acute postoperative analgesic benefits; however, concerns about delaying clinical care have likely limited widespread implementation. If future research demonstrates the effectiveness of PNBs beyond acute pain relief, it may further motivate healthcare systems to solve workflow challenges and increase the use of PNBs for hip fracture surgery. Level of Evidence: III, Cross-Sectional Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.