ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
Evidence-informed policy for monitoring SDG 3 in the Legal Amazon region: A rapid review.
Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically identify and critically assess indicators used globally and in Brazil to monitor health outcomes related to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3, with an emphasis on identifying those most suitable for the Legal Amazon region. Methods: This rapid review examined global initiatives to achieve SDG 3 and their applicability to the Legal Amazon. Systematic reviews and overviews were included, with no language restrictions, considering studies published from 2015 onwards. Searches were conducted across several databases using both controlled vocabulary and free-text terms. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment followed standardized procedures, with independent reviewers ensuring rigor and resolving discrepancies through consensus. Results: The identified indicators covered health coverage, quality of care, environmental health, epidemiology, financial aspects, and governance, although none provided calculation formulas. Studies highlighted positive impacts of health service integration and conditional cash transfer programs, improving treatment adherence, disease detection, and child health outcomes. None of the included articles described specific indicators tailored to the Amazon region. Conclusions: The Legal Amazon faces challenges such as limited healthcare access and threats from deforestation and illegal mining. This review found no systematic reviews addressing these needs, making the findings suggestive rather than definitive. Despite this gap, preliminary efforts made it possible to propose indicators tailored to the region, covering areas such as Indigenous health, environmental risks, and healthcare accessibility. These indicators require validation by regional stakeholders to ensure their relevance and effectiveness in policy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.