ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Effect of Germination and Subsequent Fermentation Period on the Functional, Color, and Antinutrients of Pigeon Pea (
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative Emerging Technologies for Pulse Flour Functionalization: A Comparison With Conventional Thermal and Biological Techniques.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Biotechnological Modulation of Legumes via Fermentation: Impacts on Nutrient Bioaccessibility, Glycemic Index, and Antinutrients-A Scoping Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Assessment of fermented vegetable wastes in Nile tilapia diets: impacts on fish performance, amino acids profile, health, and intestine histomorphology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of Germination and Subsequent Fermentation Period on the Functional, Color, and Antinutrients of Pigeon Pea (Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed the impact of germination and fermentation on the nutritional composition, physicochemical, functional, and sensory quality of pigeon pea flour from various grain fractions. Treatments applied between 24 and 72 h led to notable improvements in protein content, with germinated-fermented bran flour at 72 h reaching 21.20% compared to 12.62% untreated whole grain flour. Fat and ash contents also increased with treated samples, whereas carbohydrate content decreased with extended processing. Functional properties showed significant shifts, with water absorption capacity increasing in the germinated-fermented whole flour for 72 h (3.73 g/g), suggesting improved hydration behavior, whereas oil absorption increased to 1.43 g/g in the same sample, useful for flavor retention in formulated foods. Swelling power and solubility index also increased, particularly in the germinated-fermented bran flour for 72 h, supporting potential use in soups and instant meals. Foaming capacity improved in several treated flours, peaking at 23.5%, which may benefit baked or whipped products. Dispersibility values above 60% in certain samples indicate reconstitution potential for powdered applications. Acidification during fermentation lowered pH and increased titratable acidity, supporting shelf stability. Color parameters shifted toward darker, less red hues, influenced by treatment type and duration. Antinutrient levels, including tannins and oxalates, reduced significantly, enhancing nutritional quality. Sensory scores favored germinated-fermented dehulled grain at 48 h and germinated-fermented rootless flour for 72 h. Overall, germination and fermentation improved the functionality and nutrient density of pigeon pea flour, supporting its integration into high-protein, ready-to-use food products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.