ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Developing and validating machine learning models to predict acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-driven preoperative CT 3D planning: a narrative review on improving the accuracy of acetabular cup angle and size in total hip arthroplasty.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Adequate implant inventory management can improve efficiency, storage space, and result in cost savings in arthroplasty. This study investigates if the prediction of cup size in elective primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) cound be improved with the use of advanced machine learning. Methods: Using the arthroplasty registry of a single institution, we identified 30,583 patients who underwent primary THA between 2016 and 2024. No data was missing or incomplete. A total of 9 parameters readily available preoperatively were included as potential predictor variables. The data corpus was partitioned into training (80 %) and hold-out test (20 %) samples. Two distinct machine learning models were trained on regression tasks. The models were technically evaluated utilizing Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to assess alignment with implanted cup. 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated via bootstrapping. Real world useability was assessed by the percent of correct predictions within ±2 mm from implanted cup. Results: The quantile regression forest outperformed the explainable boosted machine (EBM) in terms of MAE (1.69 [95 % CI 1.64, 1.73] vs 1.73 [1.69, 1.77]) and real-world usability, with an accuracy of 82.85 % within ±2 mm and 97.27 % within ±4 mm. The EBM outperformed the QRF by RMSE and Spearman Correlation coefficient, weighing outliers heavier. The most important factors in order were Sex, height, age, weight, surgical approach and BMI. Conclusion: Machine learning models can predict implant sizing with very high accuracy based on a few metrics available preoperatively. This model can help decrease overall cost of THA by improving orthopaedic manufacturers' supply chains and hospitals' inventory management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.