ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Comparison of early vs. routine removal of abdominal drainage tube after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Evolving Surgical Approaches to Adult Perforated Appendicitis: A Systematic Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The utility of abdominal drainage is common in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for acute appendicitis with perforation to prevent postoperative complications, such as intraabdominal abscess (IAA) and stump fistula. Nevertheless, the drain tube placement is considered to be associated with postoperative IAA formation in cases of complicated appendicitis. Our study aims to determine whether early removal of abdominal drainage tube after LA can improve prognosis for patients with perforated appendicitis. Methods: A total of 182 patients who underwent abdominal drainage tube placement during LA due to acute appendicitis with perforation were divided into experimental group and control group by random number table method, including 87 patients in the experimental group and 95 patients in the control group. Patients in the experimental group had their abdominal drainage tube removed within 48 h after surgery. Patients in the control group removed the drainage tube after 48 h routinely. Variables of demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients between the two groups were analyzed. Postoperative outcomes, including overall complications, IAA, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), stump fistula, ileus, bleeding, postoperative length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs and readmission to hospital, were compared. Results: These two groups were similar regarding demographic and perioperative clinical characteristics like age, sex, duration of symptoms and hematological examination indicators ( Conclusions: It is safe and effective to remove abdominal drainage tube within 48 h after LA for patients with perforated appendicitis. This approach can accelerate the recovery time, decline the incidence of IAA and reduce hospitalization costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.