ArticleCancer medicine2025
Real-World Data From a Molecular Tumor Board-Assisted Cancer Care From a Single Center in The Czech Republic: Is Precision Oncology an Accessible Option, or a Privilege for a Minority of Patients?
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMolecular tumor boards (MTBs) support the development of personalized treatment strategies for patients with various cancer types based on comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of tumor tissue. Despite the unprecedented results demonstrated in many molecularly driven clinical trials, access to matched therapy remains a significant challenge in routine clinical practice worldwide.
methodsIn this study, we analyzed the MTB cohort from University Hospital Brno in the Czech Republic. Between February 2021 and April 2025, a total of 553 cancer patients with limited therapeutic options underwent CGP of tumor tissue and were subsequently presented at the MTB.
resultsThe median age of the patients was 61.1 years, and 62.2% were female. The most frequently tested diagnoses were colorectal cancer (n = 88; 15.9%), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 66; 11.9%), and pancreatic cancer (n = 65; 11.8%). The median number of prior lines of standard systemic therapy before CGP testing was two. MTB-recommended matched therapy for 326 (59.0%) out of 553 tested patients, based on 545 unique molecular alterations. The most frequently recommended drugs included immunotherapy (162/545; 29.7%), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (140/545; 25.7%), and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (63/545; 11.6%). Reimbursement was requested from healthcare insurance providers in 115 cases, with 87 (75.7%) approvals. Together with other reimbursement forms, a total of 96 (17.4%) out of 553 patients initiated matched therapy. A progression-free survival ratio (PFS2/PFS1) of ≥ 1.3 was observed in 29 (41.4%) of the 70 evaluable pretreated patients.
conclusionThis is the first study to report on a real-world MTB cohort from the Czech Republic, demonstrating a diagnostic yield comparable to previously published studies, good availability of recommended drugs, and clinical benefit in evaluable patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.