ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025
Disruptions in Cognitive-Affective Circuitry in Major Depression Disorder: Insights From REST-Meta-MDD and Its Implication for Predicting TMS Treatment Efficacy.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AQP4-IgG and mood disorders: Case series of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Article
- Disruptions in Cognitive-Affective Circuitry in Major Depression Disorder: Insights From REST-Meta-MDD and Its Implication for Predicting TMS Treatment Efficacy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is a common psychiatric disorder whose causes and manifestations are diverse and numerous. To facilitate targeted therapeutic interventions, we characterized the abnormalities in effective connectivity within the cognitive-affective (CCN-AN) circuits to identify predictive biomarkers of TMS efficacy based on a large multicenter dataset and an independent dataset from patients receiving TMS.
methodsBoth functional and effective connectivity (FC, EC) were analyzed. As there was only one significant connection observed in FC, classification based on the differences in EC was performed using REST-meta-MDD. Furthermore, correlations between these abnormal connectivity and depression severity, as well as depression and suicidality alleviation, were calculated to determine their predictive implications for TMS efficacy using an independent dataset.
resultsOverall increased connectivity from the AN to the CCN and decreased connectivity from the CCN to the AN in MDD were observed using EC. These disruptions drove the classification accuracy up to 79.1%. Furthermore, the connection from the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL. R) to the right amygdala (AMYG.R) was negatively correlated with depression scores. Notably, the IPL connectivity to the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the AMYG.R were closely correlated with depression and suicidal ideation alleviation following TMS treatment.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that MDD is characterized by disruptions in both top-down and bottom-up emotion regulation systems. Notably, the key abnormal connectivities, particularly those from the IPL to ACC and AMYG, could predict the efficacy of TMS treatment. This insight refines MDD diagnosis and paves the way for more precise targeted interventions in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.