Observational studyBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2025
When Is Postpartum Haemorrhage Treatment Initiated? A Nested Observational Study Within the E-MOTIVE Trial.
Observational study in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- When are postpartum haemorrhages diagnosed? A nested observational study within the E-MOTIVE cluster-randomised trial.The Lancet. Global health · 2025Trial
- Preoperative risk score for invasive uterus-sparing hemostasis at cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Barriers and bottlenecks to implementation of WHO recommendations for prevention, detection, and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage: a mixed-methods triangulation study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Clinical care processes for early postpartum haemorrhage diagnosis: a nested observational study within the E-MOTIVE trial.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the frequency and timing of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) treatment initiation between hospitals implementing the MOTIVE treatment bundle (which consisted of uterine Massage, Oxytocic drugs, Tranexamic acid, IntraVenous fluids and Examination) and those following usual care.
designNested prospective observational study.
settingHospitals in Nigeria, Kenya, Tanzania and South Africa participating in the E-MOTIVE trial. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Healthcare workers treating PPH.
methodsBetween June and December 2022, we observed healthcare workers for 1-2 weeks in 39 E-MOTIVE and 39 usual care hospitals across Nigeria, Kenya, Tanzania, and South Africa managing vaginal birth and treating PPH. We descriptively compared the frequency and timing from PPH detection to treatment initiation of individual treatments and the MOTIVE bundle, between E-MOTIVE care and usual care.
resultsAmong 2578 observations in E-MOTIVE care hospitals, 295 (11%) PPHs were treated, and among 2834 observations in usual care hospitals, 219 (8%) PPHs were treated. In E-MOTIVE care hospitals, 97% (286/295) of women with PPH received the MOTIVE bundle, compared to 36% (79/219) in usual care. Median initiation times for the first component were similar (0 vs. 1 min), but E-MOTIVE care hospitals achieved faster initiation of all components (13 min, IQR 6-18) compared to usual care (18 min, IQR 10-25). In total, 79% (233/295) of women in E-MOTIVE care had all components initiated within 20 min, compared to 22% (48/219) in usual care.
conclusionsTimely and comprehensive management of PPH using the MOTIVE bundle, particularly initiating all components within 15-20 min, was commonly observed in the E-MOTIVE care hospitals. Scaling up E-MOTIVE care should emphasise timely bundle initiation to strengthen PPH treatment and improve maternal health outcomes in low-and-middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.