ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Mobilisation Alarm Use in Hospitals and Alignment With Person-Centred Practice: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo explore why and how staff use alarms for falls prevention in hospital and their alignment to person-centred practice.
designQualitative interpretive design.
methodsOne hundred focus groups and 25 interviews across 10 health services were completed between October 2022 and September 2024. Participants included nurses (n = 451), allied health (n = 82), and fall prevention managers (n = 18). The Framework Method guided initial data familiarisation and analysis and led to the Person-Centred Practice Framework being identified as a useful framework.
resultsThemes generated: (1) Understaffed, under-resourced, under pressure, (2) Alarm impact on stress and workload, (3) Negotiating patient safety and patient preference, (4) Engaging family as a resource, (5) Sharing responsibility for alarms and falls prevention, and (6) Navigating ambiguity and fearing consequences.
conclusionStaff feel compelled to use alarms despite problems associated with their use and challenges to person-centred practice. Drivers of alarm use were feeling under-resourced and fearing liability if patients fell. Staff want clearer organisational guidance in alarm use but also want the freedom to use their own clinical reasoning. IMPACT: Hospitals worldwide are working to identify effective strategies for preventing falls. However, research has yet to adequately explore the perspectives of frontline nurses and allied health staff regarding the use of mobilisation alarms-a critical gap when evaluating their impact and effectiveness. This study's six key themes provide insights into why alarms are so widely used despite the limited evidence supporting their effectiveness. REPORTING
methodConsolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting. TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621000823875.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.