ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
Public Involvement in Complex Theorising: A Co-Produced Logic Model of the Role of Context in Shaping Child Health.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Theorizing How Context Influences School-Based Interventions That Support Children's Weight Management: Co-Producing a Refined Logic Model.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- A Co-production Evaluation Tool Informed by Co-production Workshops for Use in Evidence Synthesis Contexts.Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods · 2026Article
- Design and implementation ofFrontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Unlocking the heterogeneity of pediatric obesity: a phenotypic subtype-based paradigm for precision management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThere is increasing work towards drawing on theory, implementing co-production and accounting for complexity within the production of systematic reviews for public health. In this paper, we report on the process of co-producing a theory; in this case, a graphical articulation of theory in the form of a logic model, which describes how contextual factors influence children's health.
methodsWe undertook a series of three online co-production workshops, involving 18-20 participants in each, and worked with an advisory group of experts with professional and lived expertise. An online virtual whiteboard was used to support the identification of factors that contributed to poorer childhood health, explanations for these factors, and connections between different factors.
resultsDriven by government strategy, we initially focussed our work on childhood obesity. However, co-production was transformational in switching the focus of the logic model away from a narrow focus on Body Mass Index as a measure of obesity, to a more holistic theory of factors that shape children's health, recognised as the intersection between healthy eating, physical activity and mental well-being. Theorising with a diverse range of co-producers helped us to recognise the stigmatising impacts that an exclusive focus on clinical measures of children's health can have, and the way that a narrow clinical focus inhibits theorising the complexity and drivers of poorer health.
conclusionCo-production led to a switch in theorising away from narratives of children's health that focus closely on personal responsibility, towards narratives that explore structural and contextual drivers of health. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The logic model was entirely driven by the contributions of researchers, those with lived experience (e.g., as parents and/or who have experienced poor health), and those with professional experience (e.g., as teachers) who worked together to co-produce the model. An advisory group composed of people with a similar range of expertise helped to shape the conduct of co-production and dissemination (including in the preparation of this manuscript).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.