ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Combination vs. single-drug nonprescription analgesics for acute pain management: A narrative review.
Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Combination vs. single-drug nonprescription analgesics for acute pain management: A narrative review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Combining nonprescription analgesics with different mechanisms of action has been proposed as a rational strategy to optimize the management of acute pain. This review assessed the efficacy and safety of nonprescription analgesics, including paracetamol (acetaminophen), metamizole and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) used in combination vs. monotherapy in acute pain conditions. A literature search identified 25 studies that compared oral paracetamol combined with a nonprescription NSAID (oral or topical) vs. either or both components alone in an acute pain condition or in an acute episode or exacerbation of a chronic pain condition. Combination therapy provided superior pain relief vs. monotherapy in the dental impaction pain model; potential dose-sparing and opioid-sparing effects were also evident. After endodontic surgery, combination therapy provided greater pain relief vs. either component alone following a single dose, but a difference was not apparent with multiple dosing, indicating a faster onset of action with combination therapy. Studies in acute musculoskeletal pain yielded mixed results. Studies in patients with headache included caffeine in addition to paracetamol/NSAIDs and showed that this combination provided faster and more effective pain relief vs. paracetamol or an NSAID alone. Across all settings, oral combination therapy with paracetamol/NSAIDs was well tolerated, with adverse event rates similar to or even lower than those observed with monotherapy. Findings of this narrative review support the use of combination therapy with paracetamol and an NSAID in the postsurgical setting but not in acute non-low-back musculoskeletal pain. Fixed-dose oral combinations of caffeine/paracetamol/NSAIDs provide efficacy-related advantages over paracetamol or NSAID monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.