SynthesisKorean journal of anesthesiology2025
Costoclavicular brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery: a narrative review.
Synthesis in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analgesic Efficacy and Motor-Sparing Properties of Superior Trunk Block versus Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine for Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Comment on: Brachial plexus block at the level of the humeral head: a proof-of-concept observational cadaver and clinical study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026Article
- Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Procedures: A Narrative Review of Efficacy and Safety.Cureus · 2026Review
- Comparison of Interscalene Brachial Plexus, Anterior Suprascapular Nerve, and Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The costoclavicular block is a proximal approach for blocking the brachial plexus in the infraclavicular fossa. Whether the costoclavicular block offers advantages over lateral paracoracoid approaches has been debated. However, diaphragm-sparing anesthesia for shoulder surgery has recently reignited interest in the costoclavicular space. In this review, we examine the costoclavicular block as an alternative to the interscalene block for shoulder surgery, focusing on minimizing involvement of the phrenic nerve. We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases using the search terms "costoclavicular block" and "shoulder surgery," to identify relevant studies published up to April 2025. Only randomized trials meeting rigorous inclusion criteria, i.e., those that were prospectively registered, used blinded assessment, and provided sample size justification, were included. The findings of these studies suggested that local anesthetic deposition in the costoclavicular space can reliably anesthetize the brachial plexus cords, achieving a high rate of suprascapular nerve blockade, while sparing the diaphragm. The effectiveness of the anesthesia and analgesia provided by this block depends on use of the appropriate local anesthetic volume and concentration. Further research is needed to validate these findings. Nevertheless, the evidence to date indicates that the costoclavicular block is a promising alternative for patients at risk of respiratory insufficiency secondary to hemidiaphragmatic paralysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.