Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755086›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2025

Vascular Microforamina in Adult Human Braincase: A Survey on Dry Skulls.

Emiliano Bruner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Vascular Microforamina in Adult Human Braincase: A Survey on Dry Skulls.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emiliano BrunerMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6686-4616

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2021-122355NB-C33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMicroforamina are small vascular passages on the endocranial surface of the braincase, connecting the diploe of the vault bones with the endocranial space. Recently, they have been hypothesized to be involved in brain immune response and inflammation. At present, they have been described through biomedical imaging, but information on their general anatomy is still missing. MATERIALS AND

methodsA sample of 94 dry skulls from a mid-20th-century Northern-Spanish collection has been examined to supply a morphological description of the dimensions and distribution of these channels in adult humans. The size of the channels was measured through digital photographs, and their distribution was investigated throughout the vault endocranial surface.

resultsThe size of the visible channels ranges from 0.03 to 2.00 mm, although most of them may range between 0.05 and 0.15 mm. The individual variation in terms of prevalence and distribution is noticeable. The main regions presenting these vascular passages are the midsagittal posterior part of the parietal bones and the anterior branch of the middle meningeal vessels. Very small vessels can be found spotted along the minor branches of the middle meningeal artery, spreading through the parietal squama. The lambdoid region also frequently displays scattered channels. DISCUSSION: The association of these microforamina with venous sinuses and meningeal vessels stresses further the possible relationships with immune responses, clearance, and the glymphatic system. Future surveys should be devoted to investigating sexual differences, ontogenetic changes, pathological conditions, and the presence of these craniovascular features in other primates and fossil hominids.

Indexed as

SkullAdultAnthropology, PhysicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedcraniovascular traitsdiploemicrovesselsmiddle meningeal arteryvenous sinuses

Identifiers

PMID40755086
PMCPMC12319352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.