ArticlePsychophysiology2025
How Do Humans Process Audiovisual Cues for Task-Switching While Walking? An EEG/ERP Study.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Do Humans Process Audiovisual Cues for Task-Switching While Walking? An EEG/ERP Study.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contemporary work environments require humans to process audiovisual information displays during active locomotion. The attentional demands associated with using devices such as in-ear headphones and head-mounted displays may be significantly influenced by varying locomotor demands, yet this relationship remains poorly understood. This study investigates the interplay of information presentation modality, movement state, and cognitive task difficulty. In a virtual reality laboratory, 22 participants performed a cued task-switch paradigm with three cognitive task difficulty levels while standing, walking, or walking with perturbations on a treadmill. We used a questionnaire, behavioral, and mobile EEG data to investigate cognitive-motor interference. We find that locomotion interfered with cognitive task performance, and that the presentation modality of task-switch notification modified the nature of this interference. While auditory cue presentation resulted in faster responses under low cognitive load conditions, visual information presentation was less impaired by higher cognitive and locomotor demands. A detailed analysis of the EEG response to cues addressed these differences in terms of multi-modal attentional mechanisms. Hence, information presentation on wearable devices should be tailored to the specific task demands, particularly for cognitively demanding information in mobile work settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.