ArticleJournal of global health2025
Development of an innovative, competency-based, multi-speciality training programme in global health for graduate medical education.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physicians increasingly care for ethnically diverse populations. Demand for global health training in graduate medical education (GME) is increasing, but there is variability across specialities. We developed a multi-speciality GME course for trainees seeking to integrate global health into their careers. The Consortium of Universities in Global Health's Toolkit was the foundation for creating this course. The course includes eleven modules taught by faculty across specialities. Trainees completed pre- and post-course online surveys to measure their knowledge, skills, and attitudes on these global health competencies and to gather course feedback. We compared pre- and post-course data to determine change in global health competencies and course perceptions. In the first two years, 62 residents participated. Overall, trainees' knowledge of international health concepts increased by 51%. The course was well received; 95% would recommend the course to a colleague. There was no fee to participate. Faculty donated their effort to developing and teaching the course. Faculty worked in pairs to maintain feasibility of implementation and were responsible for one module. Analyses showed the course had high levels of effectiveness in increasing learners' knowledge, acceptability by learners, and feasibility of implementation. This programme collaborates across specialities and is a model for other GME programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.