Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40755008›Full record

GuidelineClinical and molecular hepatology2025

Taiwan liver cancer association management consensus guidelines for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

I-Cheng Lee, Hung-Wei Wang, Wei Teng, Tsung-Jung Lin, Chien-Hung Chen, Hsueh-Chou Lai, Teng-Yu Lee, Ching-Wei Chang, Chao-Hung Hung, Chia-Yen Dai and 15 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

I-Cheng LeeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hung-Wei WangCenter for Digestive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Wei TengDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tsung-Jung LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renai branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-Hung ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsueh-Chou LaiCenter for Digestive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Teng-Yu LeeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ching-Wei ChangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chao-Hung HungDivision of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chia-Yen DaiHepato-Biliary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yi-Ping HungSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ying-Chun ShenDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-Wei SuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Chih HoDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Wei-Chen LeeCollege of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Gar-Yang ChauDepartment of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chin-Tsung TingDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ren-Ai Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Po-Chin LiangDepartments of Medical Imaging and Radiology, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-An LiuSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pi-Yi ChangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Kuan-Yang ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renai branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shi-Ming LinDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Li-Tzong ChenKaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yi-Hsiang HuangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
TLCA Intermediate Stage HCC Working Group

Funding

TLCA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) encompasses a diverse patient population that requires individualized treatment strategies and a multidisciplinary approach. Recent advancements in systemic therapy have expanded the therapeutic options for intermediate-stage HCC, allowing for combination strategies such as systemic therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and upfront systemic therapy for individuals deemed unsuitable for TACE. Additionally, the ongoing development of treatment modalities for intermediate-stage HCC has improved the potential for curative conversion and tumor downstaging. Nevertheless, consensus on the optimal management of intermediate-stage HCC remains limited. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to develop a set of consensus guidelines for the management of intermediate-stage HCC. To address this gap, the Taiwan Liver Cancer Association (TLCA) established a working group to develop a multidisciplinary strategy for managing intermediate-stage HCC. Here, we present eight consensus statements formulated by this expert panel, which outline criteria for TACE unsuitability, treatment recommendations based on TACE eligibility, and considerations for various modalities, including conventional TACE, drug-eluting bead TACE, and transarterial radioembolization, as well as the appropriate timing for initiating systemic therapy to enable curative conversion and downstaging. These statements provide specific, evidence-based recommendations for clinicians, addressing treatment pathways based on TACE eligibility and other key considerations for intermediate-stage HCC management. The development of this consensus guideline is intended to aid clinicians in selecting the most appropriate treatment pathway for intermediate-stage HCC, support personalized treatment planning, and ultimately enhance the feasibility of achieving curative conversion.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsChemoembolization, TherapeuticConsensusHumansNeoplasm StagingReview Literature as TopicTaiwanHepatocellular carcinomaImmunotherapyIntermediate stageSystemic therapyTransarterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID40755008
PMCPMC12538147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.