ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Machine learning and SHAP value interpretation for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term clinical outcomes in Chinese female breast cancer.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Associated Four-Gene Prognostic Signature in Breast Cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Integrated pan-cancer analysis reveals a cancer-associated fibroblast oxidative stress response signature predicting immunotherapy response and prognosis.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Article
- AI-based multimodal fusion for preoperative prediction of breast microcalcifications: combining mammography and tomosynthesis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Integrative machine learning reveals a TLS signature and CCL5-CCR1 axis-associated immune remodeling in breast cancer.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio as a novel predictor for mortality in breast cancer patients admitted to ICU: a retrospective analysis using MIMIC-IV 3.1.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Metabolic phenotypes of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity among patients with breast cancer.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Radiomics-based causal machine learning for exploratory treatment-effect estimation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycle intensity in osteosarcoma: a proof-of-concept study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Using machine learning algorithms based on laboratory indicators to establish a diagnostic model for lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning distinguishes skip from continuous metastasis in N1b papillary thyroid carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Identification and external validation of a prognostic signature based on bone morphogenetic protein-related mRNAs for kidney renal clear cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Integrative multi-omics analysis identifies a circadian rhythm-associated gene signature for prognosis and therapeutic stratification in lung adenocarcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Integrative analysis of the meibum microbiome in dry eye disease: from dysbiosis and diagnostic biomarkers to immunomodulation by Bradyrhizobium-derived outer membrane vesicles.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting brain metastasis in breast cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling of axillary web syndrome in Chinese postoperative breast cancer patients using interpretable machine learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multiparametric MRI and artificial intelligence for non-invasive HER2 assessment in breast cancer: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a prognostic model for stage IV breast cancer based on primary tumor resection with machine learning methods: retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Prediction of germline BRCA mutation using clinicopathologic, MRI semantic, and radiomics features in high-risk breast cancer patients: a multicenter study.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for venous thromboembolism risk prediction in patients with lung cancer: a real-world study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Study on the Current Status of Supportive Care Needs of Elderly Breast Cancer Patients and Influencing Factors.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost models of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer (BC) suffer from insufficient data and lack interpretability. Additionally, there is a notable absence of reports from China in this field. This study is also the first to integrate the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) into such a model to evaluate its effectiveness.
methodsData from 3,036 female BC patients receiving NACT at Heilongjiang Provincial Tumor Hospital (2008-2019, median follow-up 7.28 years) were analyzed. After screening, 2,909 patients were randomized into training and validation cohorts (7:3). Using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), Support Vector Machine (SVM) models, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), the best predicting pathological complete response (pCR) model was identified, and key features were interpreted. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) Cox algorithm, combined with XGBoost and Random Forest (RF) models, identified 9 overlapping prognostic features, enhancing the nomogram's predictive accuracy for overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis revealed varying prognostic outcomes.
resultsThe XGBoost model performed best in predicting pCR, with Area Under Curve (AUC) values of 0.88 and 0.72 in the training and validation sets, respectively. SHAP analysis indicated that ER, HER2 status, ALI, and albumin (Alb) level were the four most important features. The prognostic model was also validated by high AUC values in both training and test sets. KM analysis indicated that lower ALI, non-pCR, and triple-negative BC manifested as worse clinical outcomes. However, the adverse impact of ALI on the prognosis of this cohort was mainly reflected in the long-term recurrence outcomes and non-pCR groups.
conclusionThis study is the first to introduce ALI into the prediction model for BC completing NACT and develop a large-sample model based on XGBoost. Owing to the particularity of the indicators, training and validation were conducted on real clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.