Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40754951›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2025

Machine learning and SHAP value interpretation for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and long-term clinical outcomes in Chinese female breast cancer.

Quan Yuan, Rongjie Ye, Yao Qian, Hao Yu, Yuexin Zhou, Xiaoqiao Cui, Feng Liu, Ming Niu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metabolic phenotypes of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity among patients with breast cancer.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Quan YuanDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.ORCID 0009-0003-8060-2158
Rongjie YeQuanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0003-8631-3648
Yao QianDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Hao YuSchool of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.ORCID 0009-0004-5499-5565
Yuexin ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Xiaoqiao CuiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Feng LiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.ORCID 0009-0000-2354-9416
Ming NiuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.ORCID 0009-0002-8108-2425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost models of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer (BC) suffer from insufficient data and lack interpretability. Additionally, there is a notable absence of reports from China in this field. This study is also the first to integrate the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index (ALI) into such a model to evaluate its effectiveness.

methodsData from 3,036 female BC patients receiving NACT at Heilongjiang Provincial Tumor Hospital (2008-2019, median follow-up 7.28 years) were analyzed. After screening, 2,909 patients were randomized into training and validation cohorts (7:3). Using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), Support Vector Machine (SVM) models, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), the best predicting pathological complete response (pCR) model was identified, and key features were interpreted. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) Cox algorithm, combined with XGBoost and Random Forest (RF) models, identified 9 overlapping prognostic features, enhancing the nomogram's predictive accuracy for overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis revealed varying prognostic outcomes.

resultsThe XGBoost model performed best in predicting pCR, with Area Under Curve (AUC) values of 0.88 and 0.72 in the training and validation sets, respectively. SHAP analysis indicated that ER, HER2 status, ALI, and albumin (Alb) level were the four most important features. The prognostic model was also validated by high AUC values in both training and test sets. KM analysis indicated that lower ALI, non-pCR, and triple-negative BC manifested as worse clinical outcomes. However, the adverse impact of ALI on the prognosis of this cohort was mainly reflected in the long-term recurrence outcomes and non-pCR groups.

conclusionThis study is the first to introduce ALI into the prediction model for BC completing NACT and develop a large-sample model based on XGBoost. Owing to the particularity of the indicators, training and validation were conducted on real clinical data.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMachine LearningNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNomogramsPrognosisSupport Vector MachineTreatment Outcomeadvanced lung cancer inflammation indexBreast cancermachine learningneoadjuvant chemotherapySHapley Additive ex Planations

Identifiers

PMID40754951
PMCPMC12322993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.